From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9013 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Kleinpaste Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Danger! Danger! Date: 27 Nov 1996 07:22:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149103 15972 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:25:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 12224 invoked from smtpd); 27 Nov 1996 12:51:32 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 12:51:31 -0000 Original-Received: from pocari-sweat.jprc.com (karl@pocari-sweat.jprc.com [207.86.147.217]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 13:22:11 +0100 Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by pocari-sweat.jprc.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA05390; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 07:22:11 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 27 Nov 1996 02:54:35 +0100 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9013 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9013 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I don't want to use `M-RET' for this, though -- `M-C-RET' seems > like a nice choice. Please don't use fictitious control sequences. RET is already a control character, and X' ability to "controlify" any keystroke is not a feature. Bland tty use (a substantial portion of my Gnus use is via telnet and rlogin) cannot generate "C-RET".