Re: article printing with `A P' is generating bad postscript

[Karl Kleinpaste <karl@charcoal.com>]

Reiner Steib <4uce.02.r.steib@gmx.net> writes:
> I can't see anything strange there. Did you get an error related to
> "h0" too ("h0   --nostringval--   --nostringval--")?

Not that I noticed.  I think that was just a quotation in the text
from your message.

> Which version of ps-print do you use (see the variable
> ps-print-version)?

| `ps-print-version' is a variable declared in Lisp.
|   -- loaded from "ps-print"

| Value: "3.05x1"

| Documentation:
| ps-print.el, v 3.05 <97/01/17 duthen>

That seems really old.  But it's what comes with XEmacs' sumo tarballs
these days.  (I certainly haven't any other ps-print lying around.)

> Then it's probably no Gnus error, I can reproduce the error with GNU
> Ghostscript 6.52 and 5.50 and ps-print v6.5.5 (distributed with Emacs
> 21.1).

OK, so I'm not entirely alone if you can reproduce it.

I will see if there's a more appropriate ps-print out there, but I
wonder why this used to work for me.

Hm, comments in ps-print.el say:

;; 3.05x1 -- Forked for XEmacs/No-Mule.  The official version of
;;  ps-print is Mule-only.

I will hunt for that.