From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38125 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Kleinpaste Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Rendering on Bm Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:07:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173755 19179 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:15:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 20065 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 19:07:57 -0000 Original-Received: from mesquite.slip.cs.cmu.edu (HELO cinnamon.vanillaknot.com) (128.2.207.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 19:07:56 -0000 Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by cinnamon.vanillaknot.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f7KJ7tq00731; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:07:55 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "5(T0tZd{6}pd~YzBG8O/*EW,.]6]@`m^e;fv65W^Y&=d"M\1H}>T~4_.kcDD.O~y3k)a6 hR;Nmi>9|>Nm${2IpM0^RcUEa\jcq?KOP)C&~x51l~zCHTulL^_T|u0I^kB'z@]{`2YjQu In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 19 Aug 2001 17:34:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38125 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38125 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > All the commands that select an article (and `B m' is one of them) > renders the article. I don't think it would be appropriate to > special-case `B m' here. Considering that the entire `B' keymap consists of actions involving shuffling things around in the backend (i.e. the filesystem) rather than the frontend (i.e. my eyeballs)...well, while it may currently constitute a special case, I don't see any explanation for (what I perceive as) the failure mode of process-marking 150 messages followed by `B m' followed by Gnus choking by observing for my "benefit" the lack of a known PGP key for the signed content therein. I'm moving the articles Elsewhere -- why should I care about _anything_ having to do with rendering, least of all the complicated nightmare of invoking PGP? I've actually developed the tendency to use a keyboard macro when needing to `B m': The macro begins with `C-u g', so that the article is pre-rendered in the vacuous sense, followed by `B m' to send it where it belongs. Being pre-rendered, Gnus doesn't make any further efforts involving heavyweight foo like PGP. The problem is that I don't have a way to make a keyboard macro interact with process marks.