From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37643 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Kleinpaste Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: auto-filling has been broken -- excessive indentation Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 13:16:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173019 14897 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:03:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25017 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2001 17:17:02 -0000 Original-Received: from mesquite.slip.cs.cmu.edu (HELO cinnamon.vanillaknot.com) (128.2.207.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2001 17:17:02 -0000 Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by cinnamon.vanillaknot.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f79HGtC30624; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:16:55 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: ?=p^Gj2JkX~UU_@W}[q/'Dxn19x-zfIQ](y<&ky/?1-&Nz&,!W}R.Gp+"LeGojoR =RF>?!XVs{a:`Yt(gqM<#$Zy(C@]'dR4Hy4S1.I(n3:2"R:=Uy!)K9>U!gNTyH{p +_w#F[gt).$Vyvo5=9LF^PeQ(@H#}QLAbfyYxX/8t:TDR5nA\|RmJO"EwjL8tWyvM In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:37:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37643 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37643 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > I think it was you who suggested that TAB be bound to > indent-relative-maybe. That was a good idea. No. 'Twas not me. Perhaps not a bad idea, but at the moment, whatever it is that's going on is just plain wrong. Offhand, I don't even understand the correlation between TAB binding and auto-fill indentation. I'm not using TAB. I'm just typing text, and letting auto-fill do its thing.