From: Karl Kleinpaste <karl@justresearch.com>
Subject: Re: Header (rfc) question
Date: 13 Oct 1999 23:23:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vxkk8oqwrow.fsf@beaver.jprc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Harry Putnam's message of "13 Oct 1999 20:08:05 -0700"
Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
> Is this a trend or is it even proper?
It's peculiar to OneList.com, but it's perfectly proper.
The extensive information encoded lets them handle bounce-o-grams
better, I understand.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-14 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-14 3:08 Harry Putnam
1999-10-14 3:23 ` Karl Kleinpaste [this message]
1999-10-14 7:51 ` Eric Marsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vxkk8oqwrow.fsf@beaver.jprc.com \
--to=karl@justresearch.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).