From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12466
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Karl Kleinpaste <karl@jprc.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: ~/Mail/incomingNNNNN ?
Date: 02 Oct 1997 13:50:32 -0400
Message-ID: <vxkn2ksyryv.fsf@pocari-sweat.jprc.com>
References: <tblo0cmay8.fsf@pegasus.tele.nokia.fi> <vafvhzg5ehd.fsf@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151997 3924 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:13:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:13:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@ntc.nokia.com>
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA04678
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 12:05:27 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA11589
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 13:58:38 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA08357@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:51:08 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 25352 invoked by uid 504); 2 Oct 1997 17:51:03 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 25349 invoked from network); 2 Oct 1997 17:51:03 -0000
Original-Received: from pocari-sweat.jprc.com (207.86.147.217)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 1997 17:51:02 -0000
Original-Received: (from karl@localhost)
	by pocari-sweat.jprc.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA32545;
	Thu, 2 Oct 1997 13:50:32 -0400
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: "5(T0tZd{6}pd~YzBG8O/*EW,.]6]@`m^e;fv65W^Y&=d"M\1H}>T~4_.kcDD.O~y3k)a6h
 R;Nmi>9|>Nm${2IpM0^RcUEa\jcq?KOP)C&~x51l~zCHTulL^_T|u0I^kB'z@]{`2YjQu
In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of "02 Oct 1997 18:14:38 +0200"
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12466
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12466

Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@charly.cs.uni-dortmund.de> writes:
> Development versions of Gnus set nnmail-delete-incoming to nil...

Maybe that's the theory, but that's not the practice.  Q0.11 nnmail.el:

(defcustom nnmail-delete-incoming t
  "*If non-nil, the mail backends will delete incoming files after
splitting."
  :group 'nnmail-retrieve
  :type 'boolean)