From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11631
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Karl Kleinpaste <karl@jprc.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Hmm.. 2 q's
Date: 14 Jul 1997 17:45:58 -0400
Message-ID: <vxkoh859ujt.fsf@pocari-sweat.jprc.com>
References: <al8n2nrff6p.fsf@vesuri.Helsinki.FI> <wkd8ondpwa.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>    <vxklo39xvf5.fsf@pocari-sweat.jprc.com> <199707142141.OAA15411@knife.statsci.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151309 31519 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:01:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA11830
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:39:26 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA08397
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 17:35:59 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <XAA25521@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 23:47:17 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1386 invoked by uid 504); 14 Jul 1997 21:47:16 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 1383 invoked from network); 14 Jul 1997 21:47:15 -0000
Original-Received: from pocari-sweat.jprc.com (207.86.147.217)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 1997 21:47:15 -0000
Original-Received: (from karl@localhost)
	by pocari-sweat.jprc.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA02719;
	Mon, 14 Jul 1997 17:45:59 -0400
Original-To: scott@statsci.com
In-Reply-To: Scott Blachowicz's message of "Mon, 14 Jul 1997 14:41:08 -0700"
Original-Lines: 7
Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:2021
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11631
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11631

Scott Blachowicz <scott@statsci.com> writes:
> Which means that something like
> 	Message-ID: <2342342@[123.45.67.89]>
> using the `domain-literal' form would be legal too, right?

Yup.