From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52940
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Norbert Koch <nk@viteno.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Problems with to-address
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 18:58:47 +0200
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vzel2ggym0.fsf@viteno.dyns.net>
References: <vzhe7e88lu.fsf@viteno.dyns.net> <vz3cix4yko.fsf@viteno.dyns.net>
	<rzqof1ka7g9.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054313910 3701 80.91.224.249 (30 May 2003 16:58:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 16:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1484@lists.math.uh.edu Fri May 30 18:58:29 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M1484@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19LnBt-0000qp-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19LnDd-0004rS-00; Fri, 30 May 2003 11:59:05 -0500
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19LnDU-0004rK-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 30 May 2003 11:58:56 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail 87976 invoked by alias); 30 May 2003 16:58:55 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 87970 invoked from network); 30 May 2003 16:58:55 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.lf.net (212.9.160.2)
  by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 30 May 2003 16:58:55 -0000
Original-Received: from pd9518db4.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.81.141.180] helo=viteno.dyns.net)
	by mail.LF.net with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 19LnDQ-000Ojf-2g
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:58:52 +0200
Original-Received: from nk by viteno.dyns.net with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19LnDL-0002K7-Nl
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:58:47 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: 9,{UOz`879Gt1t?~vOo"iN!BBRwO<t[L3HO!M@<pekF,!8m&1UuUTYeb44x!$5jghAECeE<
 I\~$c?.4Ti'Ls^!*r]7j&_e<0/.}xmzj/kiN\]|*^n&FX)`A`YD~z!ob;QshZi.*A2GX~kq8c?"r<(
 @YnvNer}=kY
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <rzqof1ka7g9.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (Dave Love's message of "Fri,
 30 May 2003 14:29:42 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN,
 berkeley-unix)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52940
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52940

Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk> writes:

> I haven't checked the code, but if I understand correctly, that's
> expected if XEmacs doesn't have rms and gerd's changes to the binding
> mechanism for buffer-local variables.  See Info `(elisp)Intro to
> Buffer-Local' in Emacs, though I think that text is obsolete in Emacs
> 21.

Thanks for this hint.  I'm still wondering why this happens right now,
ie what's been changed in the code base to trigger this effect.

I ask on xemacs-beta.

norbert.