xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

[Steve Youngs]

gnus-group.el requires nnrss which requires xml, so should we move
xml.el out of contrib and into lisp?

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
|        XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need.       |
|          Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good!         |
|------------------------------------<youngs@xemacs.org>---|

Re: xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

[Reiner Steib]

On Mon, May 05 2003, Steve Youngs wrote:

> gnus-group.el requires nnrss which requires xml, so should we move
> xml.el out of contrib and into lisp?

`xml.el' comes with Emacs 21.x, so putting it lisp will shadow one
version and may lead to inconsistencies.

Isn't `xml.el' included in one of the packages mentioned in (info
"(gnus)XEmacs")?  If not, we should update this node, I guess.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW   http://rsteib.home.pages.de/

Re: xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

[Norbert Koch]

Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:

Hi!

> `xml.el' comes with Emacs 21.x, so putting it lisp will shadow one
> version and may lead to inconsistencies.
>
> Isn't `xml.el' included in one of the packages mentioned in (info
> "(gnus)XEmacs")?  If not, we should update this node, I guess.

Steve Youngs put it into net-utils (package version 1.32) while
upgrading to 5.10.1.  It currently resides in the pre-release
directory.  So it's going to be part of an XEmacs package in time.
Actually I plan to officially release these things together.

norbert.

Re: xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

[Steve Youngs]

|--==> "RS" == Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:

  RS> On Mon, May 05 2003, Steve Youngs wrote:
  >>gnus-group.el requires nnrss which requires xml, so should we move
  >>xml.el out of contrib and into lisp?

  RS> `xml.el' comes with Emacs 21.x, so putting it lisp will shadow one
  RS> version and may lead to inconsistencies.

Ah, OK, I wasn't aware of this.

  RS> Isn't `xml.el' included in one of the packages mentioned in (info
  RS> "(gnus)XEmacs")?  If not, we should update this node, I guess.

Will do.

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
|        XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need.       |
|          Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good!         |
|------------------------------------<youngs@xemacs.org>---|

Re: xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

[Xavier Maillard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 568 bytes --]

On 5 mai 2003, Steve Youngs told this:

>  gnus-group.el requires nnrss which requires xml, so should we move
>  xml.el out of contrib and into lisp?

No. Just add the contrib directory to your load-path and that's
it. What is the real need to have it into the 'official' lisp tree ?
No flame here, just a question of course. I am personaly used to add
the contrib tree into my load-path, so I am just curious about that.

zeDek
--
http://www.gnusfr.org -- French Gnus user site

Anti-war disclaimer:
	"Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity"

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: xml.el - contrib -> lisp ?

[Xavier Maillard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 767 bytes --]

<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
On 5 mai 2003, Xavier Maillard stated:

>  On 5 mai 2003, Steve Youngs told this:
>  
> >  gnus-group.el requires nnrss which requires xml, so should we move
> >  xml.el out of contrib and into lisp?
>  
>  No. Just add the contrib directory to your load-path and that's
>  it. What is the real need to have it into the 'official' lisp tree ?
>  No flame here, just a question of course. I am personaly used to add
>  the contrib tree into my load-path, so I am just curious about that.
>  
>  zeDek

Do not pay attention to that :) I was not aware of the full xml.el
story ;)

zeDek
-- 
http://www.gnusfr.org -- French Gnus user site

Anti-war disclaimer:
	"Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity"

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]