From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51314
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Norbert Koch <nk@viteno.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Can spam-split be used with "normal" mail splitting?
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:06:49 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <vzptnszz5y.fsf@viteno.dyns.net>
References: <vz8yuiv1k5.fsf@viteno.dyns.net>
	<4n8yuimleo.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050084461 12281 80.91.224.249 (11 Apr 2003 18:07:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:07:41 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Fri Apr 11 20:07:37 2003
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1942w5-0003BK-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:07:37 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1942vd-0003Jm-00; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:07:09 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:08:13 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [64.157.176.121])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA13943
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:08:01 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 72416 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2003 18:06:52 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 72411 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 18:06:51 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.lf.net (212.9.160.2)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 18:06:51 -0000
Original-Received: by mail.LF.net (Smail3.2.0.111/isc.LF.net)
	via LF.net GmbH Internet Services
	via remoteip 80.131.29.131
	via remotehost viteno.dyns.net with esmtp
	from nk@viteno.net for ding@gnus.org
	for mail.gnus.org
	id m1942vJ-00eUnqC; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:06:49 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from nk by viteno.dyns.net with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1942vJ-000GsF-8k
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:06:49 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: 9,{UOz`879Gt1t?~vOo"iN!BBRwO<t[L3HO!M@<pekF,!8m&1UuUTYeb44x!$5jghAECeE<
 I\~$c?.4Ti'Ls^!*r]7j&_e<0/.}xmzj/kiN\]|*^n&FX)`A`YD~z!ob;QshZi.*A2GX~kq8c?"r<(
 @YnvNer}=kY
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <4n8yuimleo.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's
 message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:17:51 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code,
 berkeley-unix)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51314
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51314

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> As long as nnmail-split-methods processing understand that nil means
> "pass-through" and a string is a group name, there should be no issues
> at all.

Hmm, I played around with it and got either none or all mail split
into my spam group ... *sigh* ... time to go for fancy splitting.

norbert.