Re: Patch to gnus.texi

[Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net>]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

Hi!

>> Really?  I tried and the result pretty much looked the same, but I can
>> be mistaken.
>
> Try it in a newsgroup.  `S w' sends a copy to the author.

Okay, I stand corrected.  So nuke the patch.  But we should remove the
duplicate entry for S W.

norbert.




Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 6.119
diff -u -r6.119 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog	2001/08/09 22:26:00	6.119
+++ ChangeLog	2001/08/11 17:20:03
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2001-08-11  Norbert Koch  <nk@LF.net>
+
+	* gnus.texi (Summary Mail Commands): Remove duplicate entry
+
 2001-08-09 15:00:00  ShengHuo ZHU  <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
 	From Benjamin Rutt <brutt@bloomington.in.us>
 
Index: gnus.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v
retrieving revision 6.109
diff -u -r6.109 gnus.texi
--- gnus.texi	2001/08/09 22:26:01	6.109
+++ gnus.texi	2001/08/11 17:20:38
@@ -4679,13 +4679,6 @@
 @code{Reply-to}) and @code{Cc} headers in all the process/prefixed
 articles.  This command uses the process/prefix convention.
 
-@item S W
-@kindex S W (Summary)
-@findex gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
-Mail a very wide reply to the current article and include the original
-message (@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original}).  This command uses
-the process/prefix convention.
-
 @item S o m
 @itemx C-c C-f
 @kindex S o m (Summary)