* Patch to gnus.texi
@ 2001-08-11 9:27 Norbert Koch
2001-08-11 12:15 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Norbert Koch @ 2001-08-11 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi!
Here's a small patch against gnus.texi, summary mail commands.
norbert.
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 6.119
diff -u -r6.119 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2001/08/09 22:26:00 6.119
+++ ChangeLog 2001/08/11 09:22:56
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2001-08-11 Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net>
+
+ * gnus.texi (Summary Mail Commands): Add different key bindings
+ for reply functions, fix order, remove duplicate entry.
+
2001-08-09 15:00:00 ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
From Benjamin Rutt <brutt@bloomington.in.us>
Index: gnus.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v
retrieving revision 6.109
diff -u -r6.109 gnus.texi
--- gnus.texi 2001/08/09 22:26:01 6.109
+++ gnus.texi 2001/08/11 09:22:59
@@ -4655,21 +4655,6 @@
original message (@code{gnus-summary-reply-with-original}). This
command uses the process/prefix convention.
-@item S w
-@kindex S w (Summary)
-@findex gnus-summary-wide-reply
-Mail a wide reply to the author of the current article
-(@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply}). A @dfn{wide reply} is a reply that
-goes out to all people listed in the @code{To}, @code{From} (or
-@code{Reply-to}) and @code{Cc} headers.
-
-@item S W
-@kindex S W (Summary)
-@findex gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
-Mail a wide reply to the current article and include the original
-message (@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original}). This command uses
-the process/prefix convention.
-
@item S v
@kindex S v (Summary)
@findex gnus-summary-very-wide-reply
@@ -4679,10 +4664,22 @@
@code{Reply-to}) and @code{Cc} headers in all the process/prefixed
articles. This command uses the process/prefix convention.
+@item S w
+@itemx f
+@kindex f (Summary)
+@kindex S w (Summary)
+@findex gnus-summary-wide-reply
+Mail a wide reply to the author of the current article
+(@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply}). A @dfn{wide reply} is a reply that
+goes out to all people listed in the @code{To}, @code{From} (or
+@code{Reply-to}) and @code{Cc} headers.
+
@item S W
+@itemx F
+@kindex F (Summary)
@kindex S W (Summary)
@findex gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
-Mail a very wide reply to the current article and include the original
+Mail a wide reply to the current article and include the original
message (@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original}). This command uses
the process/prefix convention.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch to gnus.texi
2001-08-11 9:27 Patch to gnus.texi Norbert Koch
@ 2001-08-11 12:15 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-11 13:52 ` Norbert Koch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-08-11 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Ding Mailing List
Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net> writes:
> Here's a small patch against gnus.texi, summary mail commands.
I thought that `S w' and `f' were different?
kai
--
~/.signature: No such file or directory
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch to gnus.texi
2001-08-11 12:15 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2001-08-11 13:52 ` Norbert Koch
2001-08-11 17:13 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Norbert Koch @ 2001-08-11 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Ding Mailing List
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>> Here's a small patch against gnus.texi, summary mail commands.
>
> I thought that `S w' and `f' were different?
Really? I tried and the result pretty much looked the same, but I can
be mistaken.
norbert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch to gnus.texi
2001-08-11 13:52 ` Norbert Koch
@ 2001-08-11 17:13 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-11 17:22 ` Norbert Koch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-08-11 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Ding Mailing List
Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net> writes:
> Really? I tried and the result pretty much looked the same, but I can
> be mistaken.
Try it in a newsgroup. `S w' sends a copy to the author.
kai
--
~/.signature: No such file or directory
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch to gnus.texi
2001-08-11 17:13 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2001-08-11 17:22 ` Norbert Koch
2001-08-11 21:01 ` Kai Großjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Norbert Koch @ 2001-08-11 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Ding Mailing List
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
Hi!
>> Really? I tried and the result pretty much looked the same, but I can
>> be mistaken.
>
> Try it in a newsgroup. `S w' sends a copy to the author.
Okay, I stand corrected. So nuke the patch. But we should remove the
duplicate entry for S W.
norbert.
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 6.119
diff -u -r6.119 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2001/08/09 22:26:00 6.119
+++ ChangeLog 2001/08/11 17:20:03
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2001-08-11 Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net>
+
+ * gnus.texi (Summary Mail Commands): Remove duplicate entry
+
2001-08-09 15:00:00 ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
From Benjamin Rutt <brutt@bloomington.in.us>
Index: gnus.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v
retrieving revision 6.109
diff -u -r6.109 gnus.texi
--- gnus.texi 2001/08/09 22:26:01 6.109
+++ gnus.texi 2001/08/11 17:20:38
@@ -4679,13 +4679,6 @@
@code{Reply-to}) and @code{Cc} headers in all the process/prefixed
articles. This command uses the process/prefix convention.
-@item S W
-@kindex S W (Summary)
-@findex gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
-Mail a very wide reply to the current article and include the original
-message (@code{gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original}). This command uses
-the process/prefix convention.
-
@item S o m
@itemx C-c C-f
@kindex S o m (Summary)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch to gnus.texi
2001-08-11 17:22 ` Norbert Koch
@ 2001-08-11 21:01 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-12 10:38 ` Norbert Koch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2001-08-11 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Ding Mailing List
Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net> writes:
> Okay, I stand corrected. So nuke the patch. But we should remove the
> duplicate entry for S W.
Done. Okay?
kai
--
~/.signature: No such file or directory
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch to gnus.texi
2001-08-11 21:01 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2001-08-12 10:38 ` Norbert Koch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Norbert Koch @ 2001-08-12 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> Norbert Koch <nk@LF.net> writes:
>
>> Okay, I stand corrected. So nuke the patch. But we should remove the
>> duplicate entry for S W.
>
> Done. Okay?
Yup, thanks.
norbert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-12 10:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-11 9:27 Patch to gnus.texi Norbert Koch
2001-08-11 12:15 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-11 13:52 ` Norbert Koch
2001-08-11 17:13 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-11 17:22 ` Norbert Koch
2001-08-11 21:01 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-12 10:38 ` Norbert Koch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).