Re: Split replies to go with originals

[Terje Sannum <ts@nextel.no>]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE writes:

> That's an interesting approach, too.  Maybe my approach has the
> advantage that it also works when no message from me is involved.
> I.e., I get a Cc of a message, which I put in the foo group, then
> there is a followup from someone else, and that also gets put in the
> foo group.  This would be an advantage of my method over yours.
> 
> OTOH, your method does not depend on the cache length to be large
> enough.  Hmmm...

If it is difficult to have an index of all messages, the best way
might be to combine these methods. First chech in the cache, then try
to get the group from the original message-id, and last use the
original split rules.

-- 
\\\\ Terje Sannum <ts@nextel.no>
//// Now playing: Various Artists / For The Masses
.