From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18533
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Terje Sannum <ts@nextel.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Split replies to go with originals
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 22:42:18 GMT
Organization: Telenor Nextel AS
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <w0iugk7cty.ts.news@terje.nextel.no>
References: <vafzp9yngp1.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <w0r9v918db.ts.news@terje.nextel.no> <vaf90hhqi1y.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157041 6652 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:37:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:37:21 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01593
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 17:43:56 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB06567;
	Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:43:34 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:43:09 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA11399 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:42:52 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (sunsite.auc.dk [130.225.51.30])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA01565
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 17:42:46 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (qmail 8256 invoked by uid 509); 12 Nov 1998 22:42:44 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: emacs.ding
Original-Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.07004 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.40) Emacs/20.3
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.212.0.25
Original-X-Complaints-To: news@sunsite.auc.dk
Original-X-Trace: sunsite.auc.dk 910910538 193.212.0.25 (Thu, 12 Nov 1998 23:42:18 MET DST)
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 23:42:18 MET DST
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18533
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18533


Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE writes:

> That's an interesting approach, too.  Maybe my approach has the
> advantage that it also works when no message from me is involved.
> I.e., I get a Cc of a message, which I put in the foo group, then
> there is a followup from someone else, and that also gets put in the
> foo group.  This would be an advantage of my method over yours.
> 
> OTOH, your method does not depend on the cache length to be large
> enough.  Hmmm...

If it is difficult to have an index of all messages, the best way
might be to combine these methods. First chech in the cache, then try
to get the group from the original message-id, and last use the
original split rules.

-- 
\\\\ Terje Sannum <ts@nextel.no>
//// Now playing: Various Artists / For The Masses
.