From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9998
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Christopher Davis <ckd@loiosh.kei.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Hmm.. pop in gnus?
Date: 26 Feb 1997 10:01:39 -0500
Message-ID: <w47mjvboh8.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
References: <y8swwrwexgu.fsf@zarf-mouse.student.imsa.edu> <r9qhgj0pie6.fsf@fester.cs.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149938 21747 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:38:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:38:58 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA31983
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 07:22:29 -0800
Original-Received: from loiosh.kei.com (ckd@loiosh.kei.com [192.88.144.32]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <QAA10881@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 16:02:45 +0100
Original-Received: (from ckd@localhost)
	by loiosh.kei.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA28766;
	Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:01:39 -0500 (EST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: paul@cs.washington.edu's message of 25 Feb 97 23:37:05 GMT
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 19.15
X-Face: I8Alb*-ZdjN\/8k_QR,^l^m6GQB'S-B:}DVP].1HOw#tx:TX$k;Wl;4zqjWR|-jheM#?&be
 R<z=pG{]"563AA5pml2_[f:k>f(!|0<U[iwGMH"Z(rIqt9rGO*^KRV6^ej+*37UKHhC%+"7T>b0m=M
 ~=%.Am>"QEY.(#Ys.%"s?z,hmwp&y0%p>9+T
X-Attribution: ckd
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9998
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9998

PF> == Paul Franklin <paul@cs.washington.edu>

 PF> APOP is non-trivial though since the APOP code disappeared from the
 PF> FSF distribution about Emacs 19.29, and even if you resurrect the
 PF> required code, it needs to be installed setuid root.

I think you're confusing APOP (which uses a challenge-response
authentication) with RPOP (which used the rsh/rlogin approach).