From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5835 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus Suggestion: Default score rules Date: 02 Apr 1996 22:01:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146380 1528 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:39:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA09954 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 12:52:22 -0800 Original-Received: from aegir.ifi.uio.no (4867@aegir.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.24]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:02:00 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by aegir.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:01:56 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 25 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5835 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5835 Per Abrahamsen writes: > So I suggest that a missing "all.SCORE" file would be interpreted as > > `(("followups" > (,user-mail-address 100 nil s)) > ("xref" > (":.*:.*:.*:" -10 nil r))) ; or maybe a faster regexp... While I think that most people would definitely like to have rules such as these, I think it would be kinda naughty to have use them by default. Particularly the first one, which will result in lots and lots of ADAPT files being created. I also think it would be confusing that scoring on followups to your own articles will suddenly disappear if you create an "all.SCORE". So I don't think it's a good idea. However, perhaps there should be a menu (or whatever) of "Standard Useful Score Entries", and then the user could just tick the ones she wants. Perhaps using the `custom' interface? -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."