From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7433
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: wierd..
Date: 02 Aug 1996 19:58:50 +0200
Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <w8s4tml3bxh.fsf@hrym.ifi.uio.no>
References: <199608010745.HAA07135@istind.itea.unit.no>
	<x6wwzirgca.fsf@eyesore.no>
	<199608021108.LAA16292@istind.itea.unit.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147747 7227 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:02:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA00510 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 11:17:06 -0700
Original-Received: from hrym.ifi.uio.no (hrym.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.15]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA18027@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 19:58:53 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by hrym.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 19:58:52 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
	lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
In-Reply-To: Christian.Viken@itea.ntnu.no's message of Fri, 2 Aug 1996 11:08:59 GMT
Original-Lines: 29
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.4/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7433
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7433

Christian.Viken@itea.ntnu.no (Christian Viken) writes:

>  > > 	1: no.test 
>  > > 
>  > > nothing wrong here either...BUT! when I tried to enter the group to
>  > > read my test, pressing 'space' (tried with 'enter' also..same result),
>  > > the little bugger told me "no more unread articles".
>  > > my display:
>  > > 
>  > > 	0: no.test
>  > > 
>  > > My emacs 19.31.1 never tried to leave the Group-buffer. Seems to me it
>  > > just caught up the group. When I visited the group afterwards,
>  > > specifying 10 old articles, my test-article was there, but marked as
>  > > read. Spooky!

You may have experienced an nntp server glitch.  `M-g' (aka. "GROUP")
reported the updated article numbers but `RET' (aka. "XOVER") perhaps
wasn't updated or something, so it claimed that the article didn't
exist, so Gnus trusted that information and marked the article as
read.

I'm just guessing here, but it's a possibility.  Could you try to do
the same again -- post an article and then quickly `M-g' and `RET' the
group to see whether the same thing happens again?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen