From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4745 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sgnus PGP signature hiding stuff works too well Date: 17 Jan 1996 03:51:24 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: <199512171626.IAA13530@edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca> <199512181840.NAA28921@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov> <199512181922.UAA09722@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145449 30654 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:24:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA32123 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 19:23:03 -0800 Original-Received: from surt.ifi.uio.no (4867@surt.ifi.uio.no [129.240.76.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 03:51:26 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by surt.ifi.uio.no ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 03:51:26 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: steve@miranova.com's message of 19 Dec 1995 22:47:57 -0800 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4745 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4745 steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur) writes: > Lars> Yes, that would be nice. (Or Digital-Signature, as was > Lars> suggested.) But isn't this something that Mailcrypt should > Lars> do and not Gnus? Or should Gnus do it? Uhmn... > > Which piece of code is doing the hiding? Gnus does the hiding, but Mailcrypt does the verifying. If Mailcrypt was included in the Emacs distribution, I'd add some functions to call Mailcrypt, hide the signature, and add the suggested header/buttons to the article. `gnus-article-treat-pgp', or something. Are there any plans to include Mailcrypt in the Emacs distribution? I mean, it's a *very* useful and friendly package... -- Home is where the cat is.