From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8529 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New sketch Date: 30 Oct 1996 01:58:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148675 12651 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:17:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 26202 invoked from smtpd); 30 Oct 1996 01:08:30 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 1996 01:08:05 -0000 Original-Received: from hrym.ifi.uio.no (hrym.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.15]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 01:58:09 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by hrym.ifi.uio.no ; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 01:58:09 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 30 Oct 1996 01:30:04 +0100 Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.53/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I've now fiddled with it some -- I've unsquashed the r's and flipped > the n's as well: > . So -- does it look ok? Or do you prefer the unflipped version? I dunno myself... The flipped letters do look weird, which is good, but is it too cliched? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen