From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4356 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Persist! Date: 11 Dec 1995 15:00:23 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145114 29311 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:18:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id HAA03400 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 07:43:02 -0800 Original-Received: from surt.ifi.uio.no (4867@surt.ifi.uio.no [129.240.76.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:00:25 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by surt.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:00:25 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4356 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4356 (How does one spell "persist{e,a}nt"?) I've added a new value to the `gnus-use-cache' variable -- `passive'. This means that gnus-cache will ignore all article marks, and won't exit/enter anything from the cache unless you explicitly tell it to. `*' is the command for entering (process/prefixed) articles into the cache, and `M-*' is the command for removing the articles from the cache. Articles that are present in the cache have a `*' (`gnus-cached-mark') in the second column. I have not added a new article mark list to the info; keeping that synched with the actual cache seemed like too much writing. The second summy column is getting a bit crowded - process mark, cache mark, and replied mark, in that order of precedence. So if you have replied to an article that's in the cache, you won't be able to see that... Hmn. -- Miss Leonora Cortes, age 85, purchased three large bags of individually wrapped Halloween candles to give out last year, though no children came to her door.