* Missing specifier in summary line?
@ 1996-04-13 22:14 Mats Lidell
1996-04-14 5:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mats Lidell @ 1996-04-13 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I'm moving closer to dropping vm and just using ding. I noticed
however that my favorite summary feature in vm seems to be
missing. What I like is to have the receivers (to) name in the summary
when I have written the mail or the post (but the sender (from) when
it's not me). vm also adds a string, configurable, before the name so
that you easily can see that the message comes from you. I guess this
is most useful in mail folders where you store both sides of a
conversation.
%% Mats
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Missing specifier in summary line?
1996-04-13 22:14 Missing specifier in summary line? Mats Lidell
@ 1996-04-14 5:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1996-04-14 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Mats Lidell <matsl@contactor.se> writes:
> What I like is to have the receivers (to) name in the summary when I
> have written the mail or the post (but the sender (from) when it's
> not me).
This is on the Red Gnus todo list.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-04-14 5:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-04-13 22:14 Missing specifier in summary line? Mats Lidell
1996-04-14 5:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).