From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4196 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What Gnus version for XEmacs 19.14? Date: 01 Dec 1995 04:57:53 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: <199511161439.PAA21954@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <199511301812.TAA08145@skippy.math.ethz.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144978 28838 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:16:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA29639 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 20:37:18 -0800 Original-Received: from surt.ifi.uio.no (4867@surt.ifi.uio.no [129.240.76.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 04:57:56 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by surt.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 04:57:54 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: steve@miranova.com's message of 30 Nov 1995 13:13:23 -0800 Original-Lines: 29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4196 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4196 steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur) writes: > What version to put with XEmacs 19.14? I've been wondering about this > one too. The problem with 5.0.12 is that it has a lot of bugs in it, > and I would rate the stability of the latest September Gnus (v0.16) to > be superior at this time (considering the basic/older features and > XEmacs only). I beg to differ. I get, like, a one or two bug reports per week on 5.0.12/5.1 and a ton of bug reports on September Gnus. There are *lots* of bug in September. From what I can tell, Gnus 5.1 is quite, quite stable. > One possibility is to phase it in, like they did with mailcrypt in the > 19.13 release. Leave old GNUS as the default, but include the latest > version of September Gnus for those who wish to try it. This is what they are planning to do, I think -- ship XEmacs 19.14 with both GNUS 4.1.3 and Gnus 5.1. I don't know which one will be the default Gnus package. > By the time 19.15 is ready, September Gnus should be 5.2 and solid > (my unofficial guess). My unofficial guess is that September Gnus will become Gnus 5.2 in, say, five months, so that timescale may very well be right. -- Home is where the cat is.