From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4443 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: cached articles Date: 15 Dec 1995 20:07:46 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145188 29578 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:19:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA02260 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:41:58 -0800 Original-Received: from surt.ifi.uio.no (4867@surt.ifi.uio.no [129.240.76.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 20:07:47 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by surt.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 20:07:47 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: jvinson@cheux.ecs.umass.edu's message of 14 Dec 1995 09:28:35 -0500 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4443 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4443 jvinson@cheux.ecs.umass.edu (Jack Vinson) writes: > In the past if we had article caching turned on and marked an article with > ! or ? (tick or dormant) that article would be cached so that it didn't > disappear when the group went through its expiry process. > > Now it sounds like we have broken this behavior by creating a separate mark > (*) which will automagically cache an article. Is this the case? If so, > this means that I have to remember to cache articles that I might want to > keep around instead of ticking them, correct? No, both the old way and the new way are supported. I think that's covered in the manual. -- Home is where the cat is.