From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4454
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Things that I'm removing from the todo list
Date: 15 Dec 1995 20:14:43 +0100
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <w8ska3yb0m4.fsf@surt.ifi.uio.no>
References: <w8swx7zphbe.fsf@surt.ifi.uio.no>
	<yyaybsf5sis.fsf@arls2006.fuentez.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145197 29604 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:19:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:19:57 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA02354 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:51:24 -0800
Original-Received: from surt.ifi.uio.no (4867@surt.ifi.uio.no [129.240.76.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA18037@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 20:14:45 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by surt.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 20:14:44 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Joe Hildebrand's message of 14 Dec 1995 12:56:11 -0700
Original-Lines: 33
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4454
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4454

Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@fuentez.com> writes:

> did you ever figure out how to allow this window configuration, then?
> 
> -------------------------------------
> | groups         | summary          |
> -------------------------------------
> |         article                   |
> -------------------------------------

Yup; it'll be in September 0.23.  

The new recursive window config thing is really neat.  Just finding
the right structure for data is *so* important.  I still don't
remember who came up with this structure, but it seems very usable.  I
did a complex test -- I envisioned something that would look like:

--------------------------------
|     |                 |      |
|     |                 |      |
|     |-------------------------
|     |           |            |
------|           |            |
|     |           |            |
|     |           |            |
--------------------------------

And it came out right (almost) on the first try.

Recursive structures *rule*.  :-)

-- 
Home is where the cat is.