* Replying to the right people
@ 1996-04-16 10:25 David Kågedal
1996-04-16 17:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Kågedal @ 1996-04-16 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
What happened to gnus-reply-to-function in 0.73? It isn't used to find
out who to send replies to anymore. Is this a bug, or is there a new
variable that I don't know of?
--
David Kågedal Lysator Academic Computer Society davidk@lysator.liu.se
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~davidk/ +46-13 17 65 89
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Replying to the right people
1996-04-16 10:25 Replying to the right people David Kågedal
@ 1996-04-16 17:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1996-04-16 20:28 ` David Kågedal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1996-04-16 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
"David Kågedal" <davidk@lysator.liu.se> writes:
> What happened to gnus-reply-to-function in 0.73? It isn't used to find
> out who to send replies to anymore. Is this a bug, or is there a new
> variable that I don't know of?
All the old Gnus message composition variables are obsolete. In 0.73
you can use `message-reply-to-function' to do what the old
`gnus-reply-to-function' did. Sort of.
--
"Yes. The journey through the human heart
would have to wait until some other time."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Replying to the right people
1996-04-16 17:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 1996-04-16 20:28 ` David Kågedal
[not found] ` <vafd9579xir.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Kågedal @ 1996-04-16 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
> "David Kågedal" <davidk@lysator.liu.se> writes:
>
> > What happened to gnus-reply-to-function in 0.73? It isn't used to find
> > out who to send replies to anymore. Is this a bug, or is there a new
> > variable that I don't know of?
>
> All the old Gnus message composition variables are obsolete. In 0.73
> you can use `message-reply-to-function' to do what the old
> `gnus-reply-to-function' did. Sort of.
Yes, sort of. But it's not nearly as useful. There seems to be no way
of using information about what group the mail was split into, like
the way gnus-reply-to-function provided a group parameter. This means
I have to do a new version of my splitting regexps just for this. Or
maybe use the existing splitting routine? Maybe the last option would
work, but I liked it better before.
--
David Kågedal Lysator Academic Computer Society davidk@lysator.liu.se
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~davidk/ +46-13 17 65 89
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-04-17 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-04-16 10:25 Replying to the right people David Kågedal
1996-04-16 17:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1996-04-16 20:28 ` David Kågedal
[not found] ` <vafd9579xir.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
1996-04-17 15:08 ` David Kågedal
1996-04-17 18:22 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).