From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5956 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: pb sg .73 gnus-xmas-find-glyph-dir XEmacs Date: 16 Apr 1996 19:47:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <199604150919.LAA01262@irsun29.ifp.fr> <199604161010.MAA03065@irsun29.ifp.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146483 1911 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA01410 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 11:38:43 -0700 Original-Received: from hler.ifi.uio.no (4867@hler.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.23]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 19:48:00 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by hler.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 19:47:58 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5956 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5956 Nathanael.MAKAREVITCH@ifp.fr (Nathanael Makarevitch) writes: > this mailing-list does not send mails with a Reply-To" pointing to > itself. is it deliberate, in order to keep the amount of traffic low by > inviting participants to use private email ? Only broken mailing lists (IMHO) insert a Reply-To that points to the list itself. When one "replies", the response should go to the person who wrote the article; when one "follows up", the response should go to a wider range of people. -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."