From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5210 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus Memory usage Date: 22 Feb 1996 02:12:49 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145848 32144 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:30:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA20898 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 17:44:51 -0800 Original-Received: from aegir.ifi.uio.no (4867@aegir.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.24]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 02:12:50 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by aegir.ifi.uio.no ; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 02:12:49 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu's message of 21 Feb 1996 08:38:42 -0800 Original-Lines: 15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5210 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5210 hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu (Wes Hardaker) writes: > You know, I brought up this subject a while back (1 month?) and never > got many responses saying 'yeah me too'. Its actually worse than you > think. (FYI, I'm running 19.13 with re-alloc as well). Even if you > quit gnus, you don't regain the memory, which is what I really don't > understand. I thought (X)Emacs could only return memory that was allocated for buffers? That no cons cells (and stuff) were ever returned to the system? Has that changed? -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."