From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5373 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Selected articles, replying vs. enter-digest-group'ing Date: 29 Feb 1996 08:57:56 +0000 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145986 32595 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:33:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA05149 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 01:43:50 -0800 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:57:58 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:57:57 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: gsstark@MIT.EDU's message of 28 Feb 1996 02:57:15 -0500 Original-Lines: 19 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5373 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5373 gsstark@MIT.EDU (Greg Stark) writes: > It would be really cool if enter-digest-group respected the process mark. > This would involve adding features to nndoc, but would be great with those > multi-part FAQs and digests like Risks that have threads that span multiple > digests. This is basically the "nnmultidoc" backend that I've been mulling over for, uhm, years. But perhaps one could just use virtual groups instead? Each digest is opened as a nndoc group, and then an nnvirtual group is created using these nndoc groups are component groups? That should work. I've now added this to the Red Gnus todo list. -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."