From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3796
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus-topic open-topic indicator
Date: 02 Nov 1995 04:40:39 +0100
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <w8sspk7adl4.fsf_-_@surt.ifi.uio.no>
References: <r1xag6iakvq.fsf@hpsdlgf8.sdd.hp.com>
	<s44loq2m258.fsf@faui21i.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
	<r1x91m1so3s.fsf@hpsdlgf8.sdd.hp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144629 27317 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:10:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-From-Line: ding-request@ifi.uio.no  Wed Nov  1 20:31:11 1995
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA05229 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 20:31:01 -0800
Original-Received: from surt.ifi.uio.no (4867@surt.ifi.uio.no [129.240.76.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <EAA14629@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 04:40:40 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by surt.ifi.uio.no ; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 04:40:40 +0100
Original-Sender: lars@eyesore.no
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Dave Disser's message of 31 Oct 1995 06:51:35 -0800
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3796
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3796

Dave Disser <disser@sdd.hp.com> writes:

> > What about mimicking Emacs' selective display feature and use a trailing "
> > ..." for closed topics? That would have a similar look and feel like
> > various other folding modes (outline-mode, Hyperbole's kotl-mode,
> > hs-minor-mode).
> > 
> > Related question: would it make sense to (re)use selective display or an
> > existing folding mode?
> 
> That's a departure from the code that's already there, which is
> is more consistent with the way summary buffers have always been
> generated.

Uhm... this is for the group buffer, not the summary buffers, right?
In which case adding "..." for "folded" topics sounds very Emacsy,
which makes it The Right Thing To Do, I think.

-- 
Home is where the cat is.