From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen)
Subject: Re: mail and post-news modes: C-c C-c vs C-c C-s
Date: 02 Nov 1995 04:40:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w8su44nadl6.fsf_-_@surt.ifi.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Jason Schroeder's message of Mon, 30 Oct 95 12:10:19 -0500
Jason Schroeder <shrode@wsc.com> writes:
> I discovered the hard way that C-c C-s is not the best way to
> deliver anything. Why are they so different? I thought the only
> difference was the C-s version did not kill the buffer. As of sgnus-9, I
> could not longer post with C-c C-s and I just found that C-c C-c in mail
> mode gets the gnus-replied-mark set whereas using the other way does
> nothing special.
`C-c C-s' does `mail-send' (which just, like, sends the mail), while
`C-c C-c' is a Gnus function that does... lots of stuff.
--
Home is where the cat is.
parent reply other threads:[~1995-11-02 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <"-LHyOD.A.39C.7bQlw"@mnemosyne>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=w8su44nadl6.fsf_-_@surt.ifi.uio.no \
--to=larsi@ifi.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).