* Re: mail and post-news modes: C-c C-c vs C-c C-s
[not found] <"-LHyOD.A.39C.7bQlw"@mnemosyne>
@ 1995-11-02 3:40 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1995-11-02 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
Jason Schroeder <shrode@wsc.com> writes:
> I discovered the hard way that C-c C-s is not the best way to
> deliver anything. Why are they so different? I thought the only
> difference was the C-s version did not kill the buffer. As of sgnus-9, I
> could not longer post with C-c C-s and I just found that C-c C-c in mail
> mode gets the gnus-replied-mark set whereas using the other way does
> nothing special.
`C-c C-s' does `mail-send' (which just, like, sends the mail), while
`C-c C-c' is a Gnus function that does... lots of stuff.
--
Home is where the cat is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1995-11-02 3:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <"-LHyOD.A.39C.7bQlw"@mnemosyne>
1995-11-02 3:40 ` mail and post-news modes: C-c C-c vs C-c C-s Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).