From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7557
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Feature request, questions
Date: 12 Aug 1996 05:46:51 +0200
Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <w8swwz5i7ro.fsf@hler.ifi.uio.no>
References: <ri7ohkh2wsc.fsf@rs5.tcs.tulane.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147853 7622 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:04:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA03280 for <steve@miranova.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 21:03:57 -0700
Original-Received: from hler.ifi.uio.no (hler.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.23]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <FAA09023@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 05:46:31 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by hler.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 05:46:53 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: "St. Suika Roberts"'s message of 11 Aug 1996 20:53:07 -0500
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.11/XEmacs 19.14
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7557
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7557


"St. Suika Roberts" <wrobert2@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu> writes:

> The big feature request:  nnfolder+NOV ^_^
> If you want I'll kludge it together, but I am really not sure if that
> woulnd't be more work for you ^_^

I'm not sure there's all that much to be gained by generating NOV
files for nnfolder folders, really...

> The questions are about thread-sort-by-date and why I end up with my
> sparse threads for a number of old threads with only ticked articles
> at the end of the summary instead of further up where the dates of the
> first article would seem to indicate that they should be.  Not too
> obnoxous, but it makes one wonder.  (This shows up in my mail groups,
> which I have set to sort-by-date only)

Yes, it's not nice, but it's a tricky problem.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen