Re: Fixed! (was: mail-abbrev?)

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>]

Ketil Z Malde <ketil@ii.uib.no> writes:

> I found out.  Or, at least, I made the problem go away by renaming the
> require for 'mail-abbrev with a require for 'mail-abbrevs.  That's
> abbrevS, with an S at the end.
> 
> Possibly a new name from Xemacs-19.14 (I use a beta version -- but so
> does a lot of other people on the list, don't they?  Steve?)

No, I just forgot the "s" at the end.

> However, now I feel that getting new articles take an insurmountably
> long time - is it just my NFS/NNTP connection not being up to par, or is
> there in fact a slowdown from 0.76?  Is there anything I can do in the
> way of profiling or something to measure where the sluggishness stems
> from?

`M-x elp-instrument-package RET gnus RET' will profile Gnus.  
`M-x elp-results' will give you the results.

> Ah, one more thing - when citing an article that already contain cited
> text, I often get something like this (the prepended tab not included):
> 
> 	> >blah blah
> 
> 	> gobble gobble
> 
> ..but C-c C-q mangles the first one, due to, I think the spaces used.
> Perhaps message-fill-yanked-message could be made more intelligent --
> maybe using some heuristics used in the highlighting code?

I often `W w' articles before following up to them, which solves the
problem, kinda.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen