From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6338 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Fixed! (was: mail-abbrev?) Date: 22 May 1996 18:51:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9605221345.AA01020@due.ii.uib.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146808 3313 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:46:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from spork.callamer.com (root@spork.callamer.com [199.74.141.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA04103 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 12:30:57 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by spork.callamer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA22194 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 12:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from hler.ifi.uio.no (4867@hler.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.23]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 20:51:16 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by hler.ifi.uio.no ; Wed, 22 May 1996 20:51:15 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Ketil Z Malde's message of 22 May 1996 17:18:40 +0200 Original-Lines: 37 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.91/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6338 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6338 Ketil Z Malde writes: > I found out. Or, at least, I made the problem go away by renaming the > require for 'mail-abbrev with a require for 'mail-abbrevs. That's > abbrevS, with an S at the end. > > Possibly a new name from Xemacs-19.14 (I use a beta version -- but so > does a lot of other people on the list, don't they? Steve?) No, I just forgot the "s" at the end. > However, now I feel that getting new articles take an insurmountably > long time - is it just my NFS/NNTP connection not being up to par, or is > there in fact a slowdown from 0.76? Is there anything I can do in the > way of profiling or something to measure where the sluggishness stems > from? `M-x elp-instrument-package RET gnus RET' will profile Gnus. `M-x elp-results' will give you the results. > Ah, one more thing - when citing an article that already contain cited > text, I often get something like this (the prepended tab not included): > > > >blah blah > > > gobble gobble > > ..but C-c C-q mangles the first one, due to, I think the spaces used. > Perhaps message-fill-yanked-message could be made more intelligent -- > maybe using some heuristics used in the highlighting code? I often `W w' articles before following up to them, which solves the problem, kinda. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen