From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38802
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Mats Lidell <matsl@contactor.se>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Backend is not a word
Date: 18 Sep 2001 09:57:26 +0200
Sender: matsl@contactor.se
Message-ID: <wck7yxexsp.fsf@pm1.contactor.se>
References: <2n3d5lldop.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<m38zfd7b7m.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174609 24444 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <matsl@contactor.se>
Return-Path: <matsl@contactor.se>
Original-Received: (qmail 28455 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2001 07:57:54 -0000
Original-Received: from gw.contactor.se (HELO pm1.contactor.se) (193.15.23.130)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2001 07:57:54 -0000
Original-Received: (from matsl@localhost)
	by pm1.contactor.se (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA01282;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:57:27 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pm1.contactor.se: matsl set sender to matsl@contactor.se using -f
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: #[2|<dA3K)phEjPoe_+{?KWZs2Vok~Z~uEbBt60456eF)o/h4h(H4b}/AW/],#]f&jzUm2=
 ;Az4)~4I)m}L{iv`}weDBboj]$Wc3lSitIoJn/pOHv:)nQVZm!0W'}/htP$RD]zxD6=&2**A?EYt1b
 Q'zaZ#'1Sfa&O.ej"y
In-Reply-To: <m38zfd7b7m.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)
Original-Lines: 13
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38802
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38802

>>>>> Paul wrote:

Paul> It is.  When I say "backend", you know what I mean.  If it
Paul> doesn't appear in dictionaries, then that's a deficiency in the
Paul> dictionaries.

I agree. A simple search on the net gives a lot of hits for backends
quite similar to the gnus backend. Languages evolves. Backend is
becoming a compound word!?

Yours
-- 
%% Mats