From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22735 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: IMAP + MIME + pGnus... Date: 22 Apr 1999 14:59:16 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86emlfpdff.fsf@kramer.bp.aventail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160601 30881 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:36:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA16623 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 09:04:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB26923; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 07:59:47 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 22 Apr 1999 08:00:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA03326 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 08:00:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA16537 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 08:59:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21610; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 14:59:16 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "21 Apr 1999 09:43:44 +0200" Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22735 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22735 >>>>> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE: > Steinar Bang writes: >> What's holding me back right now, is lack of article editing >> possiblities,... and I'm sortof addicted to reparenting... I also >> like to hack MIME types from application/octet-stream (which >> MSMail/MSExchange and Lotus Notes put on everything) into something >> more meaningful. > There has been talk on the gnus-imap list about emulating article > editing by deleting the original article and submitting a new > (changed) one. I know, I've taken part in it. That was one of 3(?) alternatives. But there never was any conclusion, was there...? If there was, it slipped by me.