From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11241
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnagent
Date: 01 Jun 1997 21:35:53 +0200
Message-ID: <wh206mazfq.fsf@heidrun.troll.no>
References: <ycqd8qcc73g.fsf@g63-106.citenet.net> <m2n2pfbc8y.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <x7soz7dyjb.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <m2lo4ybtmt.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <whoh9uk20w.fsf@heidrun.troll.no> <m2pvua7xwn.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <whoh9tiheq.fsf@heidrun.troll.no> <whvi41gt4u.fsf@heidrun.troll.no> <m267w0n1hg.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150983 29151 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:56:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA01420
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:24:45 -0700
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by sandy.calag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA23922
	for <steve@calag.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:24:44 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA20324
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 15:24:02 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA06532@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:37:51 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 17765 invoked by uid 504); 1 Jun 1997 19:37:49 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 17762 invoked from network); 1 Jun 1997 19:37:48 -0000
Original-Received: from abel.metis.no (HELO gw.metis.no) (193.90.64.1)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 1997 19:37:47 -0000
Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA02854; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:37:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA10875; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:37:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by heidrun.troll.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA02937; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:35:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 30 May 1997 22:34:03 +0200
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/Emacs 19.34
Original-Lines: 24
Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1630
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11241
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11241

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>:

> Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:
>> Hm... to actually *discover* that I've done something that needs
>> correcting, I need to have copies of the outgoing messages take the
>> normal routes into their respective mail groups.

> I usually discover that I've mistyped 50% of the words and forgot what
> I was meaning to say two seconds after I've send a mail.  :-)

That's the usual state of things for me, as well.  But this last
suggestion was prompted by discovering an error in a message I had
sent to a mailing list.

>> Ie. delayed sending, but spooling of private copies.  Today I do this
>> with a Bcc, but I guess/hope/belive, that you can do this within Gnus
>> itself...? 

> I never use Bcc -- I use Gcc.

I kindof like having the messages I archive been through the same MTA
massaging, as the outgoing message (more or less).  I may be fooling
myself with this, however...