From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9367
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: More naming problems
Date: 10 Jan 1997 10:46:59 +0100
Sender: sb@norne.metis.no
Message-ID: <wh20bt50bw.fsf@norne.metis.no>
References: <m2buayigoo.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <yahpvzendkn.fsf@twi.tudelft.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.93)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149405 18075 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:30:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id CAA09419 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 02:04:05 -0800
Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA24133@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:47:32 +0100
Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA08780; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:47:00 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA21528; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:46:58 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by norne.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA05399; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:46:59 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Hans de Graaff's message of 10 Jan 1997 09:23:36 +0100
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9367
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9367

>>>>> Hans de Graaff <J.J.deGraaff@twi.tudelft.nl>:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
>> Which brings us back to "q".  Was "Quince Gnus" the best we could
>> come up with?

> I think so, yes. I also suggested Quassia Gnus, but technically a
> quassia is a tree, not a fruit.

> Also, does this mean we get three more version before Millennium Gnus
> ([nop]gnus)? Hmm, Nop Gnus, well, never mind. Does *sound* nice,
> though.

Well... the next one after mgnus, almost gives itself... ngnus for
Nostradamus Gnus... (all this talk about some Millennium or other,
y'know!).

Nah! Dammit!  That one was already used by November Gnus.  This sucks!
:-(

Hm... nognus, maybe...?