From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10734 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PATCH: Skip over ticked articles in summary buffer Date: 17 Apr 1997 13:21:20 +0200 Sender: sb@norne.metis.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150554 26052 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:49:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA02834 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 04:40:18 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 13:22:02 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 22426 invoked by uid 504); 17 Apr 1997 11:19:39 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22423 invoked from network); 17 Apr 1997 11:19:36 -0000 Original-Received: from abel.metis.no (HELO gw.metis.no) (193.90.64.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 1997 11:19:34 -0000 Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA24711; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 13:21:25 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA05851; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 13:21:20 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by norne.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA27627; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 13:21:21 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 17 Apr 1997 13:14:57 +0200 Original-Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.42/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10734 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10734 >>>>> Steinar Bang : >>>>> John Griffith : >> After some discussion with Aharon, I would like to make a couple of >> suggestions. >> First, I like Aharon's idea that I should be able to enter a group >> and be positioned on an article but without actually opening it. > So do I. I've been pondering how to do this. In fact, I'd like to register for the record, that I like all of John's suggestions. Both the two-stage positioning and select, and the navigate without selecting. This is behaviour you (well... I...) want in groups with lots of ticked articles.