From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29348
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnimap-list-pattern for UoW
Date: 01 Mar 2000 18:22:32 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <wh4saqli5j.fsf@viffer.metis.no>
References: <whu2iqnb4q.fsf@viffer.metis.no> <iluaeki24yf.fsf@badis.pdc.kth.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166031 2245 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:07:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:07:11 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2C9D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Thu,  2 Mar 2000 02:33:04 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB28740;
	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:31:33 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 02 Mar 2000 01:30:42 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA07367
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:30:31 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from viffer.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5DCD051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu,  2 Mar 2000 02:30:38 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from sb@localhost)
	by viffer.metis.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA30692;
	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 08:30:38 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Simon Josefsson's message of "01 Mar 2000 14:30:16 +0100"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)
Original-Lines: 14
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29348
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29348

>>>>> Simon Josefsson <jas@pdc.kth.se>:

> Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:
>> If I'm about to connect to a UoW imapd, and my folders are residing
>> under ~/imap, would this be a sensible setting of nnimap-list-pattern
>> be ("INBOX" ("imap/" . "*")) ?
>> 
>> Or should I go for ("INBOX" "imap/*") ?

> With the UoW server I believe the two are equivalent.  The first is
> more estheticly pleasing though, IMHO.

That's what I thought.  With the first, I can lose the "imap/" part
from the mail group name?