From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21361 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Message forwarding using mime or not using mime Date: 20 Feb 1999 13:27:46 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87btiqhvi8.fsf@gamera.hws> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159479 22557 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:17:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA26637 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:28:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB14087; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 06:28:04 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 20 Feb 1999 06:28:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA02968 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 06:28:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA26625 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:28:10 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA05187; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 13:27:46 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hal Snyder's message of "19 Feb 1999 16:35:43 -0600" Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21361 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21361 >>>>> Hal Snyder : > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> > 2. Can we have the old style forwarding back as an option? >> >> Nope. It felt very, very good to rip out several screenfuls of code >> that did the old style. :-) > Does this mean there's no simple way to forward a message and > intersperse comments with forwarded content? :-( The best way to do that would anyways be to do a reply to get the forwarded text quoted, and change the To-field.