From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18725 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME composition (was: Storing the group a message has been written to) Date: 16 Nov 1998 09:24:26 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157200 7735 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:40:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA07138 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 03:25:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB09029; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 02:24:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 16 Nov 1998 02:24:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA11941 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 02:24:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA07131 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 03:24:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA03462; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 09:24:26 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Wes Hardaker's message of "13 Nov 1998 13:28:52 -0800" Original-Lines: 31 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.42/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18725 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18725 >>>>> Wes Hardaker : >>>>> On 13 Nov 1998 19:47:12 +0100, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen said: Lars> Should I do that next, or is MIME composition more important? > MIME MIME MIME Lars> Did we even discuss MIME composition? How should it be done? > I actually like the way TM does mime composition (but hated the > display usage, and like your set much better). > The C-c C-x C-i feature to include a new file was damn convenient... Yep. But native MIME composition should be easier to modify, than the one of TM. At one point I looked at changing the inclusion of HTML files from: Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit to Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="filename.html" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit But so much was hard coded around the text major type, that this wasn't doable. (The reason I wanted to do this, was that I was sending some HTML pages to someone with Lotus Notes, and Lotus Notes is unable to make use of the MIME type, and needs the file name extension to discover that this was an HTML page, and open it in a web browser)