From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9682
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Was that last release OK?
Date: 28 Jan 1997 12:11:55 +0100
Sender: sb@tyr.metis.no
Message-ID: <wh4tg2xddw.fsf@tyr.metis.no>
References: <m2680jm2iv.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <0fg1zmly7p.fsf@fraxinus.daimi.aau.dk> <m2ohealqzs.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <whn2tuxnqy.fsf@tyr.metis.no> <rj20b66xux.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.101)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149668 19900 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:34:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:34:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA25993
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 03:37:02 -0800
Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <MAA25563@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:12:28 +0100
Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA06189; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:11:56 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA11512; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:11:55 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 28 Jan 1997 08:51:50 +0100
Original-Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.82/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9682
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9682

>>>>> Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>:

> Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

>> And that is a 100% decrease.  No mean feat!

> Just a 50% decrease, I would hope.

Of course.  If it had been an increase of the same number of bytes, it
would have been 100%, tho'