From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/28519
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Mailcap behavior not as expected
Date: 02 Jan 2000 17:12:08 +0100
Organization: NCR METIS
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <wh66xcbgh3.fsf@viffer.metis.no>
References: <873dsgnb02.fsf@inanna.danann.net> <rj9028h4ce.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165352 30287 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:55:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D36D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sun,  2 Jan 2000 13:09:58 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAB04814;
	Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:09:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 02 Jan 2000 12:07:37 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA02718
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:07:27 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from viffer.metis.no (gran.metis.no [193.90.64.36])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B1AD051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun,  2 Jan 2000 13:05:28 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from sb@localhost)
	by viffer.metis.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA06177;
	Sun, 2 Jan 2000 17:12:08 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: viffer.metis.no: sb set sender to sb@metis.no using -f
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "02 Jan 2000 16:37:37 +0100"
Original-Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28519
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28519

>>>>> Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>:

> Daniel Pittman <daniel@danann.net> writes:
>> Anyway, WIBNI pGnus also preferred the earlier entries, allowing it to
>> work like metamail(1) and it's friends?

> When the standard is silent, following the "sample" implementation
> (metamail) is probably the best.

Agreed.  That sounds like a good rule-of-thumb.