From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25849 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: RFC 2646 Date: 12 Oct 1999 10:19:36 +0200 Organization: NCR METIS Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163163 16238 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:19:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA25517 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 04:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB11164; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 03:21:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 12 Oct 1999 03:21:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA04181 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 03:21:36 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA25498 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 04:19:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA09392; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:19:36 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "11 Oct 1999 15:06:23 +0200" Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07009701 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97.1) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25849 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25849 >>>>> Per Abrahamsen : > Steinar Bang writes: >> Of course one problem with this solution is that offenders like >> eg. MS Outlook and OE will never implement it, because it would >> break with the MS policy of creating subtle and some not so subtle >> annoyances in other programs that tries to interoperate with them. > Maybe not, but Gnus should at least play nice to those who *does* > implement it. I agree completely.