From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33185 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: ognus Date: 04 Nov 2000 12:45:16 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <2nwvetu80i.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> <200010291739.RAA06135@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169337 23756 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:02:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CFDD049B for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 14:54:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAC12462; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 13:54:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 04 Nov 2000 05:55:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA26777 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 05:55:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.bang.priv.no (c96-s55-r14h3.upc.chello.no [213.46.211.96]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613A6D049B for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 06:55:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.bang.priv.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA28530; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:55:32 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Original-Lines: 18 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33185 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33185 >>>>> Per Abrahamsen : > Dave Love writes: >> This is unfortunate. Now people (like me) used to doing updates >> against the CVS head or, I guess, picking up snapshots, get >> something unstable that they're not expecting and they can't pick >> up bug fixes to Gnus 5.8. It also screws me merging stuff for >> Emacs 21. > All other CVS based projects I know of either have HEAD as the front > of the development branch, Yes. > or are planning to do so in the future because having HEAD be the > stable branch causes too many problems. Yes.