From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31857 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is the gnus XEmacs package still necessary? Date: 19 Jul 2000 11:38:10 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168221 16438 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:43:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D35D051F for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:00:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAC25466; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:00:29 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:59:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22436 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:59:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.computas.no (c235-s24-r13h3.upc.chello.no [212.186.252.235]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EE7D051F for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:59:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.computas.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA32008; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 17:59:33 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "17 Jul 2000 22:26:57 -0400" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Original-Lines: 8 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31857 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31857 >>>>> Stainless Steel Rat : > Maybe. You'd probably be better off removing the XEmacs Gnus > install entirely, grabbing the current release tarball, unpack it, > and run the CVS checkout over that. What's the gain from unpacking the tarball first? Does it have files that are no longer in the CVS?