From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18778 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME composition (was: Storing the group a message has been written to) Date: 17 Nov 1998 15:52:03 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <199811161945.OAA24469@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157246 8104 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:40:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA11828 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 09:52:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB12258; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 08:52:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 17 Nov 1998 08:52:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA09084 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 08:52:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA11805 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 09:52:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA17150; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 15:52:03 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "17 Nov 1998 13:37:52 +0100" Original-Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.42/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18778 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18778 >>>>> Per Abrahamsen : > Then again, it can also be implemented in terms of plain MIME. I'm > not sure going through MML would offer any benefits. Plain MIME > _is_ a markup language, I don't think message composers should be forced to deal with plain MIME... > just not a very pretty one. Exactly! "Bug-ugly and unreadable" would be more accurate.