From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8110 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Long time to exit summary buffer, possible speed enhancement? Date: 30 Sep 1996 07:37:15 +0100 Sender: sb@metis.no Message-ID: References: <199609291309.OAA29461@gandalf.uio.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.84) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148324 10168 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:12:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA28141 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 23:59:53 -0700 Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 08:38:03 +0200 Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA23289; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:37:31 +0100 Original-Received: by hub.metis.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA03810; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:37:31 +0100 Original-Received: by client.metis.no (8.6.11/8.6.12) id HAA21183; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 07:37:30 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Ken Raeburn's message of 29 Sep 1996 17:36:34 -0400 Original-Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8110 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8110 >>>>> Ken Raeburn : > Hallvard B Furuseth writes: >>> A hack workaround to this is to move all the articles (mark everything >>> with `#', then hit `B m') from the mail group to that same mail group, >> Besides, you can't do that with news articles. An old news article will >> be followed by a *huge* hole in a newsgroup with high voloume and rapid >> expiry, if it is crossposted to a group with slow expiry or if it has an >> Expires: header which makes it stay around for some time. > But does leaving a big news group (as opposed to a mail group) incur > the same delays? (The original poster reported the problem with > mail groups, not news groups.) I doubt it, since the slowdown I'm > seeing is due to gnus-driven expiration. If leaving a news group is > slow also, that's probably a different problem. Oh! Was it when leaving, you saw the delays? Shows me not to respond before seeing what it's all about. In those newsgroup, with big gaps, I see slow startup time (slow for the number of articles unmarked + number of new). Are there any traces I can make to find out where it uses its time?