From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21068 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More charset things Date: 09 Feb 1999 09:05:56 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87d83qkyjf.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87ognahyoh.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159245 21080 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:14:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA17693 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 03:06:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB11098; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 02:06:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 09 Feb 1999 02:06:36 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA02253 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 02:06:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA17684 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 03:06:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA00621; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 09:05:56 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "08 Feb 1999 10:52:43 -0500" Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21068 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21068 >>>>> François Pinard : > That is why Lars could well decide, one of these days, to support > UTF-8 as an encoding (which it really is) on the same level as > Base64, and moreover, rather fun to implement. It might be > convenient that Gnus do so as a contribution to the Unicode effort, > without really waiting for Emacs to do it. But isn't UTF-8 support something that really should be done at the C level (like base64 is done in newer emacsen)? Or am I thinking of UTF-7 here...? (does anyone have some handy online references?)